Evidence-layer confidence for the proposed Aave risk framework

Continuing the discussion from [ARFC] Aave Risk Framework : This framework raises an important evidence-layer question. Risk categories such as asset risk, bridging risk, monitoring / automated risk oracle systems, and chain risk are necessary. But they still depend on a lower representational layer: what is observed, what is explained, what is historically traced, what is authorization-proven, and what remains Unknown? In my recent public FET research note, I argue that DeFi transparency is not explanation. Current configuration, historical configuration action, oracle/source provenance, and